Selected Infrastructure & Leadership Development Projects
Advocate Development Conference
Challenge: Advocates were required to complete 12 annual continuing education hours, but existing opportunities were fragmented and difficult to access alongside the emotional and logistical demands of the role. This led to inconsistent completion rates, last-minute efforts to meet requirements, and added pressure on leadership to monitor compliance while maintaining engagement.
Solution: We created and piloted a one-day conference designed to streamline continuing education while strengthening engagement and connection. The conference allowed advocates to earn up to seven of their required hours in a single day, reducing the ongoing burden of piecing together training throughout the year.
We led the full scope of the project—from concept to execution. This included developing and leading the planning committee, securing speakers, guiding volunteers, managing logistics, coordinating food and refreshments, and overseeing the full-day experience.
Impact: Launched in 2018, the conference became a cornerstone development experience that advocates continue to look forward to. Beyond engagement, it reduced friction in meeting requirements and created a more sustainable approach to ongoing development.
Strategic Insight: This project reflects my broader approach to leadership performance: identifying where systems create unnecessary strain and redesigning them to better support the people responsible for carrying the work. Instead of asking individuals to do more, we focus on creating structures that make the work more sustainable, aligned, and effective.
Continuing Education Infrastructure Development
Challenge: Even with the introduction of a centralized training event, advocates were still expected to independently source the majority of their continuing education hours. This placed ongoing responsibility on individuals to find, evaluate, and attend relevant training—creating inefficiencies, inconsistent access to quality learning opportunities, and added pressure on both advocates and leadership to ensure requirements were met.
Solution: We established and served in a Continuing Education Coordinator function to create a more structured, accessible approach to ongoing learning. Rather than placing the burden on advocates to source their own training, we built relationships with community organizations to bring relevant learning opportunities directly to them.
This included identifying training needs, collaborating with external partners, coordinating sessions, and creating a more consistent pipeline of development opportunities throughout the year.
Impact: This approach not only improved access to continuing education and supported advocates in meeting requirements more efficiently, but also strengthened organizational relationships within the community. It created a more sustainable, supported model for ongoing development that extended beyond one-time events.
Strategic Insight: This work reflects a core principle in my approach to leadership performance: when systems rely too heavily on individual effort to function, they create unnecessary strain. By shifting from a self-service model to a structured, supported approach, organizations can reduce pressure, improve consistency, and strengthen both internal performance and external partnerships.
Supervisor Onboarding Structure Development
Challenge: New supervisors were stepping into leadership without a defined onboarding process, clear expectations, or consistent guidance. Each team lead was left to onboard based on personal experience, creating wide variation in how supervisors were trained. This led to slower ramp-up time, inconsistent decision-making, and added strain on both new supervisors and the leaders responsible for supporting them.
Solution: We developed a structured Supervisor Onboarding Guide to bring clarity, consistency, and direction to the onboarding process. The guide outlined key responsibilities, workflows, expectations, and practical tools needed to support supervisors in understanding both the role and how to navigate it effectively.
The goal was not just to provide information, but to create a repeatable framework that reduced ambiguity and supported more confident, aligned leadership from the start.
Impact: Originally designed for a single team, the guide was quickly adopted by other team leads and continues to be used to onboard new supervisors. It created a more consistent onboarding experience, reduced the burden on individual leaders to “fill in the gaps,” and improved readiness for those stepping into supervisory roles.
Strategic Insight: This work reflects a core principle in my approach: when roles lack clarity, performance becomes dependent on individual interpretation rather than aligned execution. By creating structure at the point of entry, organizations can reduce leadership strain, accelerate effectiveness, and build a stronger foundation for sustainable performance.
Team Lead Role Structure & Reference Development
Challenge: The Team Lead role existed without a defined framework, leaving leaders responsible for carrying out responsibilities that had never been clearly outlined. Without shared expectations or guidance, each Team Lead was forced to interpret the role independently—resulting in inconsistent execution, role confusion, and increased cognitive and emotional load as leaders navigated both the work and the responsibility of defining how the work should be done.
Solution: We co-developed a Team Lead Reference Manual to define the role, clarify expectations, and provide a practical, go-to resource for those operating within it. This included outlining responsibilities, decision-making boundaries, key workflows, and guidance to support leaders in navigating the day-to-day demands of the role.
The intent was to move the role from loosely defined and individually interpreted to clearly structured and consistently executed.
Impact: The manual is now used across all Team Leads and has been referenced by senior leadership as a foundational resource for the role. It created greater alignment, reduced ambiguity, and provided leaders with the clarity needed to operate more effectively and confidently.
Strategic Insight: This project reflects a key pattern I often see in organizations: when roles exist without clearly defined structure, leaders are left to carry both the work and the responsibility of figuring out how the work should be done. By formalizing the role, organizations can reduce unnecessary cognitive and emotional load, strengthen consistency, and improve overall leadership performance.
The Pattern Behind the Work
Across each engagement, the issue wasn’t effort — it was structure.
Our work focuses on identifying those gaps and redesigning systems so leaders are supported, aligned, and able to perform without carrying unnecessary strain.
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.